Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 15 197250 ESC 36 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 27 July 2015
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 2535 Gerrard St E
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 27 July 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 4,166 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 15 197246 ESC 36 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Site Plan Control application for the proposed development of 37 residential stacked and stacked back to back townhouses within 3 separate buildings. The buildings are arranged in an east-west configuration parallel to Gerrard St. E. A total of 4,166 m2 of residential gross floor area is proposed on the 0.33 ha site. The two buildings closest to Gerrard St. E. are proposed to have 4-storeys plus roof top amenity area, with the tallest building closest to Gerrard Street. The third building at the back of the site is proposed to be 3-storeys tall and has no rooftop amenity area. A total of 54 vehicular parking spaces (46 for residents including 16 tandem spaces, and 8 visitor) and a loading space are proposed in an underground parking garage, accessed from Gerrard St. E. Related Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application 15 197246 ESC 36 OZ.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Symmetry Developments Inc.SM21012 · 10 November 2014 · “2535 Gerrard Street East.”
- Symmetry Developments Inc.SM21028 · 10 November 2014 · “2535 Gerrard Street East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.