Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 15 170321 NNY 34 OZ
1648-1682 Victoria Park Ave; 1650 Victoria Park Ave; 1650-1666 Victoria Park Ave; 1668 Victoria Park Ave; 1668A-1682A Victoria Park Ave; 1682 Victoria Park Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 8 June 2015
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1648-1682 Victoria Park Ave; 1650 Victoria Park Ave; 1650-1666 Victoria Park Ave; 1668 Victoria Park Ave; 1668A-1682A Victoria Park Ave; 1682 Victoria Park Ave
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Submitted
- 8 June 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 179 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Resubmission Form Oct 6, 2015 - The applicant proposes to construct four blocks of stacked back-to-back four-storey townhouses, having a total of 179 residential units. Also proposed are 205 vehicular parking spaces, of which 35 are proposed to be visitor. These would be provided for in an underground parking garage. August 26, 2016 - resubmission including new site plan approval application proposing four blocks of stacked back-to-back four-storey townhouses, having a total of 151 residential units. Also proposed are 169 vehicular parking spaces, of which 20 are proposed to be visitor. These would be provided for in an underground parking garage. March 6, 2017 - resubmission with four blocks of back to back stacked townhouses, comprising 151 residential units. 180 parking spaces are provided in an underground garage, of which 30 will be visitor spaces
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16
4 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.