Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 15 139193 STE 27 CD

34 Hazelton Avenue; 36 Hazelton Ave; 38 Hazelton Ave

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 10 April 2015; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 34 Hazelton Avenue; 36 Hazelton Ave; 38 Hazelton Ave
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 10 April 2015
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 21 units
Related file: 08 169177 STE 27 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To obtain draft plan of condominium for a 7-storey residential building with 21 dwelling units and 3 levels of below grade parking.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Alterra-Zinc (Hazelton) Ltd.
SM18865 · 24 January 2013 · “36 Hazelton Avenue.”
Alterra Developments 2000 Limited
SM18866 · 24 January 2013 · “36 Hazelton Avenue.”
The Alterra Group of Companies
SM18872 · 24 January 2013 · “36 Hazelton Avenue”
Alterra-Zinc (Hazelton) Ltd.
SM18723 · 28 November 2012 · “36 Hazelton Avenue.”
Zinc Construction Inc.
SM13087 · 21 May 2009 · “34 Hazelton Avenue”
Zinc Construction Inc.
SM12915 · 8 April 2009 · “34 Hazelton Avenue”
Zinc Construction Inc.
SM11270 · 28 February 2008 · “34 Hazelton Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11

4 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11: 4 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.