Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 14 235303 NNY 09 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 9 October 2014
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 75 Billy Bishop Way
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 9 October 2014
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- AT4429839
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To permit a retail development consisting of 4 commercial buildings with 140 surface parking spaces. Pedestrian access to Wilson Subway station also incorporated.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Colliers/ ManulifeSM37304 · 2 February 2026 · “75 Billy Bishop Way”
- Manulife Canadian Property PortfolioSM36594 · 29 April 2025 · “75 Billy Bishop Way”
- Manulife Canadian Property PortfolioSM35656 · 4 June 2024 · “75 Billy Bishop Way”
- Manulife Canadian Property PortfolioSM34817 · 18 September 2023 · “75 Billy Bishop Way”
- Manulife Canadian Property PortfolioSM32403 · 6 October 2021 · “75 Billy Bishop Way”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.