lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 14 153614 NNY 26 OZ

844 Don Mills Rd

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
8 May 2014
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
844 Don Mills Rd
Ward
Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
Submitted
8 May 2014
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
4,921 units
Related file
16 236387 NNY 26 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

APPLICATION SUPERCEDED BY 16 236387 NNY 26 OZ. To permit the redevelopment of the 60 acre subject site into a new community consisting of: office buildings (including the retention of the Celestica headquarters); commercial and retail space; 4,921 residential units within a range of building types including tall buildings, mid-rise buildings and low-rise town houses; land for a community centre, new public roads, open spaces and parks. The proposal will be developed in phases, in conjunction with the Don Mills Crossing Study. The Study is a comprehensive review of the anticipated growth around the intersection of Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East and builds on the work of Eglinton Connects. The Study will result in a new planning framework which will include implementation measures to support co-ordinated development of employment, residential and community uses. The current application is a revision to the May 2014 Official Plan Amendment application (14 153614 NNY 26 OZ) and submission of new Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16

4 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16: 4 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied4Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied8Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.