Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 14 136031 NNY 23 SA

7 Bogert Ave; 9 Bogert Ave; 9A Bogert Ave; 9B Bogert Ave; 11 Bogert Ave; 15 Bogert Ave; 18 Poyntz Ave; 19 Bogert Ave; 20 Poyntz Ave; 22 Poyntz Ave; 26 Poyntz Ave; 31 Bogert Ave; 4726-4728 Yonge St; 4736 Yonge St; 4736A Yonge St; 4736B Yonge St; 4744 Yonge St; 4750 Yonge St

Ward 18 · Lily ChengDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 1 April 2014; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 7 Bogert Ave; 9 Bogert Ave; 9A Bogert Ave; 9B Bogert Ave; 11 Bogert Ave; 15 Bogert Ave; 18 Poyntz Ave; 19 Bogert Ave; 20 Poyntz Ave; 22 Poyntz Ave; 26 Poyntz Ave; 31 Bogert Ave; 4726-4728 Yonge St; 4736 Yonge St; 4736A Yonge St; 4736B Yonge St; 4744 Yonge St; 4750 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted: 1 April 2014
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 08 178556 NNY 23 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

The intent of this application is to revise the existing Site Plan Agreement to permit one additional standard floor on the west tower (from 30 to 31 storeys). A Minor Variance application was approved to facilitate the addition. No amendment to the Official Plan was required.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Yonge Poyntz Partnership Ltd.
SM11593 · 22 April 2008 · “4750 Yonge Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18

18 lobbied · 125 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18: 18 lobbied and 125 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	18	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	125	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.