Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 14 134708 NNY 33 SB
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 28 March 2014
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 1 Adra Villaway
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Submitted
- 28 March 2014
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 583 units
- Related file
- 11 330323 NNY 33 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Revised Draft Plan of Subdivision in connection with a Rental Housing & Demolition application (File No. 11 331382 NNY 33 RH) and applications to amend the Official Plan and Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan and former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 (File No. 11 330023 NNY 33 OZ).The revised plan of subdivision application proposes the creation of 4 blocks and a new public road. Block 1 on the draft plan is proposed to be developed with 24 stacked rental replacement townhouse units and a low rise apartment building comprising 67 rental replacement dwelling units. Block 2 is proposed to be developed with 24 stacked rental townhouse units. Block 3 is proposed to be developed with 583 condominium dwelling units. Block 4 along the southern portion of the site is proposed to be dedicated to the City for open space purposes. The proposed public road varies in width from 18.5 metres to 16.5 metres.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 17
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.