Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 14 107694 NNY 15 SA
1603 Eglinton Ave W; 1607 Eglinton Ave W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 22 January 2014
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 1603 Eglinton Ave W; 1607 Eglinton Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 22 January 2014
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 219 units
- Related file
- 09 199813 NNY 15 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Mixed use development comprised of an 8-storey podium fronting Eglinton Avenue West, a 16-storey tower and 3-storey townhouses fronting onto Lanark Avenue (total of 219 residential units with ground floor commercial). 157 parking spaces will be provided in 3 levels of underground parking.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Empire Communities (1603 Eglinton) LtdSM24851 · 15 July 2017 · “1603 Eglinton Ave West”
- Empire Communities (1603 Eglinton) LtdSM24549 · 11 May 2017 · “1603 Eglinton Ave West”
- Empire Communities (1603 Eglinton) LtdSM24550 · 11 May 2017 · “1603 Eglinton Ave West”
- Empire Communities (1603 Eglinton) LtdSM24552 · 11 May 2017 · “1603 Eglinton Ave West”
- 1603 Eglinton Avenue West Inc.SM14504 · 26 May 2010 · “1603 Eglinton Avenue West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | 511 | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.