Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 13 268270 ESC 20 SB
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 21 November 2013
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 743 Warden Ave
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 21 November 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 13 268029 ESC 35 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Plan of subdivision. Agreement the result of the OMB Decision dated January 5, 2016 in Board File NO. MM140029. Registered Plan #66M-2549. Subdivision Agreement registered on July 13, 2018 as Instrument # AT4908517.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Dymon Storage CorporationSM32380 · 30 September 2021 · “743 Warden Avenue”
- Zahavish Downtown Developments Ltd.SM30968 · 1 December 2020 · “743 Warden Avenue”
- Stafford Development Inc.SM29119 · 5 November 2019 · “743 Warden Avenue.”
- Mattamy Homes LimitedSM25404 · 7 December 2017 · “743 Warden Ave”
- The Goldman GroupSM11541 · 14 April 2008 · “743 Warden Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 20
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.