Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 13 268029 ESC 35 OZ

Ward 20 · Parthi KandavelDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 20 November 2013; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 110 Cleanside Rd; 743 Warden Ave
Ward: Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
Submitted: 20 November 2013
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

These applications were appealed to the OMB. A partial Order was issued on October 23, 2015; followed by another partial order on January 5, 2016 allowing the appeal of the official plan amendment, the zoning by-law amendment and the draft plan of subdivision for 743 Warden Avenue. Official Plan Amendment No. 322 by By-law No. 525-2016(OM); and Zoning By-Law No. 527-2016(OMB) and 528-2016(OMB).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Dymon Storage Corporation
SM32380 · 30 September 2021 · “743 Warden Avenue”
Zahavish Downtown Developments Ltd.
SM30968 · 1 December 2020 · “743 Warden Avenue”
Stafford Development Inc.
SM29119 · 5 November 2019 · “743 Warden Avenue.”
Mattamy Homes Limited
SM25404 · 7 December 2017 · “743 Warden Ave”
The Goldman Group
SM11541 · 14 April 2008 · “743 Warden Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20

13 lobbied · 19 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20: 13 lobbied and 19 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	13	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	19	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.