lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 13 222566 STE 22 SA

87 Davisville Ave; 89 Davisville Ave; 91 Davisville Ave; 93 Davisville Ave; 95 Davisville Ave; 97 Davisville Ave; 99 Davisville Ave; 101 Davisville Ave; 103 Davisville Ave; 105 Davisville Ave; 107 Davisville Ave; 108 Balliol St; 110 Balliol St; 112 Balliol St; 114 Balliol St; 116 Balliol St; 118 Balliol St; 120 Balliol St; 122 Balliol St; 124 Balliol St; 126 Balliol St; 128 Balliol St

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
19 August 2013
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
87 Davisville Ave; 89 Davisville Ave; 91 Davisville Ave; 93 Davisville Ave; 95 Davisville Ave; 97 Davisville Ave; 99 Davisville Ave; 101 Davisville Ave; 103 Davisville Ave; 105 Davisville Ave; 107 Davisville Ave; 108 Balliol St; 110 Balliol St; 112 Balliol St; 114 Balliol St; 116 Balliol St; 118 Balliol St; 120 Balliol St; 122 Balliol St; 124 Balliol St; 126 Balliol St; 128 Balliol St
Ward
Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted
19 August 2013
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
33,335 m² gross floor area
Related file
11 328745 STE 22 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal for a Site Plan Approval for a 30 storey and 15 storey building comprising of a total of 33335m2 of residential gross floor area. Theses 2 buildings (on seperate parcels of land) will consist of 35 bachelor units, 357 single bedrooms and 129 two bedrooms with a total of 297 parking spaces (245 for residential use and 52 for visitors). Address shall be 87-107 Davisville Ave and 108-128 Balliol St.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied511

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=4
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied3%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied32—100% (n=4)0%3%0.00
Matched, unlobbied72511100% (n=7)0%0%0.05
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.