Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 13 205326 ESC 42 SA
5625 Sheppard Ave E; 5706 X Sheppard Ave E; 5780 Sheppard Ave E; 5780-5800 Sheppard Ave E; 5800 Sheppard Ave E
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 16 July 2013
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 5625 Sheppard Ave E; 5706 X Sheppard Ave E; 5780 Sheppard Ave E; 5780-5800 Sheppard Ave E; 5800 Sheppard Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
- Submitted
- 16 July 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposed Sheppard East Station along Sheppard Avenue East between Progress Avenue and Gateforth Drive. This is the terminal station for the SRT Extension Project being brought forward by Metrolinx. Station is comprised of a tunnel track through Rosebank Park, main station and passenger drop-off on the south side of Sheppard adjacent to the Chinese Cultural Centre and bus terminal on the north side of Sheppard.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 23
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.