Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 13 184877 STE 14 SA

Ward 4 · Gord PerksDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 10 June 2013; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 2376 Dundas St W; 2388 Dundas St W
Ward: Ward 4 · Gord Perks
Submitted: 10 June 2013
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 11 317575 STE 14 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposal for Site Plan Approval for an 8-storey mid-rise building along Dundas Street West, and a 23-storey tower at the rear of the property adjacent the rail corridor. The proposal also includes a passenger pick-up and drop-off facility to serve the Metrolinx/GO Union-Peason Express. Zoning has been approved by the OMB (By-law 354-2014). The site plan application was also appealed to the OMB which has directed that the City complete its review andf provide appropriate conditions. This circulation is to address outstanding issues raised by toronto Building staff regarding compliance with the site-spacific Zoning By-law approved for the site. The associated Zoning application is file No. 11 317575 STE 14 OZ.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Queenswell Ltd.
SM29393 · 12 December 2019 · “2376 Dundas Street West”
Queenswell Ltd.
SM28132 · 2 May 2019 · “2376 Dundas Street West”
Dunwest Properties Ltd.
SM26900 · 26 October 2018 · “2376 Dundas Street West.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4

17 lobbied · 33 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4: 17 lobbied and 33 matched unlobbied applications in 13 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	17	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	33	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.