Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 13 180561 WET 06 OZ
1 Father Redmond Way; 1 Vaudeville Dr; 2 Vaudeville Dr; 3 Father Redmond Way; 3 Vaudeville Dr; 4 Vaudeville Dr; 5 Father Redmond Way; 5 Vaudeville Dr; 6 Vaudeville Dr; 7 Father Redmond Way; 7 Vaudeville Dr; 8 Vaudeville Dr; 9 Father Redmond Way; 9 Vaudeville Dr; 10 Vaudeville Dr; 11 Father Redmond Way; 11 Vaudeville Dr; 12 Vaudeville Dr; 13 Father Redmond Way; 13 Vaudeville Dr; 14 Vaudeville Dr; 15 Father Redmond Way; 15 Vaudeville Dr; 16 Vaudeville Dr; 17 Father Redmond Way; 17 Vaudeville Dr; 18 Vaudeville Dr; 19 Father Redmond Way; 19 Vaudeville Dr; 20 Vaudeville Dr; 21 Father Redmond Way; 21 Vaudeville Dr; 22 Vaudeville Dr; 23 Father Redmond Way; 23 Vaudeville Dr; 24 Vaudeville Dr; 25 Father Redmond Way; 25 Vaudeville Dr; 26 Vaudeville Dr; 27 Father Redmond Way; 27 Vaudeville Dr; 28 Vaudeville Dr; 29 Father Redmond Way; 29 Vaudeville Dr; 30 Vaudeville Dr; 31 Father Redmond Way; 31 Vaudeville Dr; 32 Vaudeville Dr; 33 Father Redmond Way; 33 Vaudeville Dr; 34 Vaudeville Dr; 35 Father Redmond Way; 35 Vaudeville Dr; 36 Vaudeville Dr; 37 Vaudeville Dr; 39 Vaudeville Dr; 41 Vaudeville Dr; 43 Vaudeville Dr; 45 Vaudeville Dr; 47 Vaudeville Dr; 49 Vaudeville Dr; 51 Vaudeville Dr; 53 Vaudeville Dr; 55 Vaudeville Dr; 57 Vaudeville Dr; 59 Vaudeville Dr; 61 Vaudeville Dr; 63 Vaudeville Dr; 65 Vaudeville Dr; 67 Vaudeville Dr; 72 Treeview Dr; 74 Treeview Dr; 76 Treeview Dr; 78 Treeview Dr; 80 Treeview Dr; 82 Treeview Dr; 84 Treeview Dr; 86 Treeview Dr; 88 Treeview Dr; 90 Treeview Dr; 92 Treeview Dr; 94 Treeview Dr; 96 Treeview Dr; 98 Treeview Dr; 100 Treeview Dr; 102 Treeview Dr; 278 Valermo Dr; 280 Valermo Dr; 282 Valermo Dr; 284 Valermo Dr; 286 Valermo Dr; 288 Valermo Dr; 290 Valermo Dr; 292 Valermo Dr; 294 Valermo Dr; 296 Valermo Dr; 298 Valermo Dr; 300 Valermo Dr; 302 Valermo Dr; 304 Valermo Dr; 306 Valermo Dr
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 4 June 2013
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Father Redmond Way; 1 Vaudeville Dr; 2 Vaudeville Dr; 3 Father Redmond Way; 3 Vaudeville Dr; 4 Vaudeville Dr; 5 Father Redmond Way; 5 Vaudeville Dr; 6 Vaudeville Dr; 7 Father Redmond Way; 7 Vaudeville Dr; 8 Vaudeville Dr; 9 Father Redmond Way; 9 Vaudeville Dr; 10 Vaudeville Dr; 11 Father Redmond Way; 11 Vaudeville Dr; 12 Vaudeville Dr; 13 Father Redmond Way; 13 Vaudeville Dr; 14 Vaudeville Dr; 15 Father Redmond Way; 15 Vaudeville Dr; 16 Vaudeville Dr; 17 Father Redmond Way; 17 Vaudeville Dr; 18 Vaudeville Dr; 19 Father Redmond Way; 19 Vaudeville Dr; 20 Vaudeville Dr; 21 Father Redmond Way; 21 Vaudeville Dr; 22 Vaudeville Dr; 23 Father Redmond Way; 23 Vaudeville Dr; 24 Vaudeville Dr; 25 Father Redmond Way; 25 Vaudeville Dr; 26 Vaudeville Dr; 27 Father Redmond Way; 27 Vaudeville Dr; 28 Vaudeville Dr; 29 Father Redmond Way; 29 Vaudeville Dr; 30 Vaudeville Dr; 31 Father Redmond Way; 31 Vaudeville Dr; 32 Vaudeville Dr; 33 Father Redmond Way; 33 Vaudeville Dr; 34 Vaudeville Dr; 35 Father Redmond Way; 35 Vaudeville Dr; 36 Vaudeville Dr; 37 Vaudeville Dr; 39 Vaudeville Dr; 41 Vaudeville Dr; 43 Vaudeville Dr; 45 Vaudeville Dr; 47 Vaudeville Dr; 49 Vaudeville Dr; 51 Vaudeville Dr; 53 Vaudeville Dr; 55 Vaudeville Dr; 57 Vaudeville Dr; 59 Vaudeville Dr; 61 Vaudeville Dr; 63 Vaudeville Dr; 65 Vaudeville Dr; 67 Vaudeville Dr; 72 Treeview Dr; 74 Treeview Dr; 76 Treeview Dr; 78 Treeview Dr; 80 Treeview Dr; 82 Treeview Dr; 84 Treeview Dr; 86 Treeview Dr; 88 Treeview Dr; 90 Treeview Dr; 92 Treeview Dr; 94 Treeview Dr; 96 Treeview Dr; 98 Treeview Dr; 100 Treeview Dr; 102 Treeview Dr; 278 Valermo Dr; 280 Valermo Dr; 282 Valermo Dr; 284 Valermo Dr; 286 Valermo Dr; 288 Valermo Dr; 290 Valermo Dr; 292 Valermo Dr; 294 Valermo Dr; 296 Valermo Dr; 298 Valermo Dr; 300 Valermo Dr; 302 Valermo Dr; 304 Valermo Dr; 306 Valermo Dr
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 4 June 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 98 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposed amendments to the Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit the development of 98 residential units .
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Mattamy Homes LimitedSM23238 · 14 June 2016 · “300 Valermo Drive”
- UrbancorpSM19797 · 24 October 2013 · “300 Valermo Drive”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.