Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 13 164210 WET 04 OZ

1 St Stevens Crt; 3 St Stevens Crt; 5 St Stevens Crt; 7 St Stevens Crt; 9 St Stevens Crt; 289 The Kingsway; 291 The Kingsway; 299 The Kingsway

Ward 2 · Stephen HolydayDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 7 May 2013; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1 St Stevens Crt; 3 St Stevens Crt; 5 St Stevens Crt; 7 St Stevens Crt; 9 St Stevens Crt; 289 The Kingsway; 291 The Kingsway; 299 The Kingsway
Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Submitted: 7 May 2013
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposed replacement of 5 rental buildings with 4 new buildings. The existing 17 storey building will be retained. Revised materials have been submitted through the City Solicitor as a result of the OMB decision dated April 27, 2017 & November 23, 2017 (Case No 150676/File No. 160752). The revised materials for review include: a Draft Official Plan Amendment to OPA 298, Draft Site Specific Zoning By-law Amendment, Architectural Plans & Arborist Report/Tree Preservation Plan.NOTE: Limited Circulation

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2

9 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2: 9 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	9	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.