Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 13 142169 STE 27 OZ
1 Sultan St; 3 Sultan St; 5 Sultan St; 7 Sultan St; 9 Sultan St; 11 St Thomas St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 28 March 2013
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Sultan St; 3 Sultan St; 5 Sultan St; 7 Sultan St; 9 Sultan St; 11 St Thomas St
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 28 March 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 10 313261 STE 11 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Lifting of the "h" to allow for the developemnt of lands as approved in by law 1049-2012. See related file 12-123068.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Lee DevelopmentsSM16091 · 23 March 2011 · “9 Sultan St.”
- St. Thomas Commercial Developments IncorporatedSM16048 · 14 March 2011 · “11 St. Thomas Street”
- St. Thomas Commercial Developments IncorporatedSM15753 · 19 January 2011 · “11 St. Thomas Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.