Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 13 133965 NNY 16 OZ
117 Roselawn Ave; 119 Roselawn Ave; 121 Roselawn Ave; 123 Roselawn Ave; 123A Roselawn Ave; 123B Roselawn Ave; 123C Roselawn Ave; 125A Roselawn Ave; 125B Roselawn Ave; 125C Roselawn Ave; 127 Roselawn Ave; 129 Roselawn Ave; 131 Roselawn Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 15 March 2013
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 117 Roselawn Ave; 119 Roselawn Ave; 121 Roselawn Ave; 123 Roselawn Ave; 123A Roselawn Ave; 123B Roselawn Ave; 123C Roselawn Ave; 125A Roselawn Ave; 125B Roselawn Ave; 125C Roselawn Ave; 127 Roselawn Ave; 129 Roselawn Ave; 131 Roselawn Ave
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Submitted
- 15 March 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 12 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Four blocks of three storey residential condominium townhouses, each containing 3 dwelling units and one level of underground parking under the site. Total of 12 dwelling units proposed.Zoning By-law 1191-2017 (OMB)
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8
33 lobbied · 57 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 33 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 12% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 57 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 27% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.