Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 13 132390 NNY 24 SA

238 Finch Ave E; 240 Finch Ave E; 242 Finch Ave E; 244 Finch Ave E; 250 Finch Ave E; 252 Finch Ave E; 254 Finch Ave E; 256 Finch Ave E; 258 Finch Ave E

Ward 18 · Lily ChengDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 13 March 2013; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 238 Finch Ave E; 240 Finch Ave E; 242 Finch Ave E; 244 Finch Ave E; 250 Finch Ave E; 252 Finch Ave E; 254 Finch Ave E; 256 Finch Ave E; 258 Finch Ave E
Ward: Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted: 13 March 2013
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 12 243614 NNY 24 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

The applicant has submitted an official plan amendment, zoning by-law amendment, plan of subdivision and site plan application for a 58 unit townhouse development consisting of 8 blocks. Six of the blocks would front on to a new proposed public road having two access points from Finch Avenue East. The remaining two blocks would front on to Finch Avenue East. The townhouses would be approximately 10.5 metres and 4-storeys in height. Proposed are a total of 58 residential parking spaces (1 per residential unit) with visitor parking on the proposed new street.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18

18 lobbied · 125 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18: 18 lobbied and 125 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	18	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	125	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.