lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 13 128786 STE 22 SA

139 Redpath Ave; 141 Redpath Ave; 143 Redpath Ave; 145 Redpath Ave; 183 Roehampton Ave; 185 Roehampton Ave; 187 Roehampton Ave; 189 Roehampton Ave; 191 Roehampton Ave; 193 Roehampton Ave; 195 Roehampton Ave

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
6 March 2013
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
139 Redpath Ave; 141 Redpath Ave; 143 Redpath Ave; 145 Redpath Ave; 183 Roehampton Ave; 185 Roehampton Ave; 187 Roehampton Ave; 189 Roehampton Ave; 191 Roehampton Ave; 193 Roehampton Ave; 195 Roehampton Ave
Ward
Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted
6 March 2013
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Related file
13 128791 STE 22 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposal for Site Plan Approval and Zoning By-Law Amendment for (183-195 Roehampton Ave and 139-145 Redpath Ave) for a new 35-storey condominium tower consisting of 30,750m2 of residential space and retail at grade with a total of 160 parking spaces below grade. See related Zoning By-Law Amendment 13-128791 and Minor Variance Application A0436/16TEY.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied511

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=4
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied3%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied32—100% (n=4)0%3%0.00
Matched, unlobbied72511100% (n=7)0%0%0.05
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.