Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Development application 13 106413 STE 21 PL
1 Lyndhurst Crt; 1A Lyndhurst Crt; 1B Lyndhurst Crt; 1C Lyndhurst Crt; 7 Austin Terrace; 7A Austin Ter; 7B Austin Ter; 7C Austin Ter
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 16 January 2013
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
- Addresses
- 1 Lyndhurst Crt; 1A Lyndhurst Crt; 1B Lyndhurst Crt; 1C Lyndhurst Crt; 7 Austin Terrace; 7A Austin Ter; 7B Austin Ter; 7C Austin Ter
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 16 January 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 13 106405 STE 21 CD
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Applications for a plan of Common Element Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption in relation to 6 unit freehold town homes ( 7A to C Austin Terrace ) and 2 semi-detached homes (1B and C Lyndhurst Court) with common element driveway at the rear, and a detached dwelling (1A Lyndhurst Court) that will not be part of the common element condominium.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- RenaissanceSM16018 · 3 March 2011 · “7 Austin Terrace”
- The Camrost CorporationSM12690 · 26 January 2009 · “7 Austin Terrace”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.