Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 12 240757 ESC 36 OZ
1 Water Willow Lane; 2 Water Willow Lane; 3 Water Willow Lane; 4 Water Willow Lane; 5 Water Willow Lane; 6 Water Willow Lane; 7 Water Willow Lane; 8 Water Willow Lane; 9 Water Willow Lane; 10 Water Willow Lane; 3757A St Clair Ave E; 3757B St Clair Ave E; 3759A St Clair Ave E; 3759B St Clair Ave E; 3761A St Clair Ave E; 3761B St Clair Ave E; 3765A St Clair Ave E; 3765B St Clair Ave E; 3767A St Clair Ave E; 3767B St Clair Ave E; 3769 St Clair Ave E
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- In progress
- Submitted
- 5 September 2012
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Water Willow Lane; 2 Water Willow Lane; 3 Water Willow Lane; 4 Water Willow Lane; 5 Water Willow Lane; 6 Water Willow Lane; 7 Water Willow Lane; 8 Water Willow Lane; 9 Water Willow Lane; 10 Water Willow Lane; 3757A St Clair Ave E; 3757B St Clair Ave E; 3759A St Clair Ave E; 3759B St Clair Ave E; 3761A St Clair Ave E; 3761B St Clair Ave E; 3765A St Clair Ave E; 3765B St Clair Ave E; 3767A St Clair Ave E; 3767B St Clair Ave E; 3769 St Clair Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 5 September 2012
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 21 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposed townhouse development consisting of 21 units in four building blocks to be serviced by a private laneway and two single detached dwellings fronting Brimley Rd. The two dwellings on Brimley Road will be severed from the remainder of the property.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20
13 lobbied · 19 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.