Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 169750 STE 22 OZ

17 Lascelles Blvd; 19 Lascelles Blvd; 21 Lascelles Blvd; 23 Lascelles Blvd; 23A Lascelles Blvd; 23B Lascelles Blvd; 23C Lascelles Blvd; 23D Lascelles Blvd; 25 Lascelles Blvd; 25A Lascelles Blvd; 25B Lascelles Blvd; 25C Lascelles Blvd; 25D Lascelles Blvd; 25E Lascelles Blvd; 25F Lascelles Blvd

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 9 May 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 17 Lascelles Blvd; 19 Lascelles Blvd; 21 Lascelles Blvd; 23 Lascelles Blvd; 23A Lascelles Blvd; 23B Lascelles Blvd; 23C Lascelles Blvd; 23D Lascelles Blvd; 25 Lascelles Blvd; 25A Lascelles Blvd; 25B Lascelles Blvd; 25C Lascelles Blvd; 25D Lascelles Blvd; 25E Lascelles Blvd; 25F Lascelles Blvd
Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted: 9 May 2012
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Rezoning application for construction of 10 townhomes with common element underground parking spaces. - 3 stories.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12

44 lobbied · 60 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,799

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=9
Matched, unlobbied100% n=9

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied14%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12: 44 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	44	1,925	100% (n=9)	0%	14%	0.02
Matched, unlobbied	60	1,799	100% (n=9)	0%	10%	0.04

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.