lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 133688 STE 27 OZ

36 Wellesley St W; 951 Bay St; 955 Bay St; 965 Bay St; 967 Bay St; 969 Bay St; 971 Bay St

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
7 March 2012
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
36 Wellesley St W; 951 Bay St; 955 Bay St; 965 Bay St; 967 Bay St; 969 Bay St; 971 Bay St
Ward
Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted
7 March 2012
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
769 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

OPA and Rezoning to permit an addition to the base and on top of the existing 32-storey Sutton Place Hotel and to permit demolition/conversion of existing purpose-built rental units. The development is proposed for a total of 41-storey with 769 residential units (691 condo and 78 rental).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

83 lobbied · 97 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=10
  • Matched, unlobbied93% n=14

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied11%
  • Matched, unlobbied17%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 83 lobbied and 97 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied83—100% (n=10)0%11%0.14
Matched, unlobbied971,79393% (n=14)7%17%0.08
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.