Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 11 330323 NNY 33 OZ
1 Adra Villaway; 1 Okra Tomar Cres; 1 Tomar Villaway; 1-25 Grado Villaway; 2 Tomar Villaway; 2-24 Grado Villaway; 3 Adra Villaway; 3 Tomar Villaway; 4 Tomar Villaway; 5 Adra Villaway; 5 Tomar Villaway; 6 Adra Villaway; 6 Tomar Villaway; 7 Adra Villaway; 7 Tomar Villaway; 8 Adra Villaway; 8 Tomar Villaway; 9 Adra Villaway; 9 Tomar Villaway; 10 Adra Villaway; 10 Tomar Villaway; 11 Adra Villaway; 11 Tomar Villaway; 12 Adra Villaway; 12 Tomar Villaway; 13 Adra Villaway; 13 Tomar Villaway; 14 Adra Villaway; 14 Tomar Villaway; 15 Adra Villaway; 15 Tomar Villaway; 16 Adra Villaway; 16 Tomar Villaway; 17 Adra Villaway; 17 Tomar Villaway; 18 Adra Villaway; 18 Tomar Villaway; 19 Adra Villaway; 19 Tomar Villaway; 20 Adra Villaway; 20 Tomar Villaway; 21 Adra Villaway; 21 Tomar Villaway; 22 Adra Villaway; 22 Tomar Villaway; 23 Adra Villaway; 23 Tomar Villaway; 24 Tomar Villaway; 25 Adra Grado Way; 25 Adra Villaway; 25 Tomar Villaway; 26 Tomar Villaway; 27 Adra Villaway; 27 Tomar Villaway; 28 Tomar Villaway; 29 Adra Villaway; 29 Tomar Villaway; 30 Okra Tomar Cres; 30-44 Grado Villaway; 31 Adra Villaway; 33 Adra Villaway; 35 Adra Villaway; 37-49 Grado Villaway; 45 Adra Villaway; 46 Adra Villaway; 47 Adra Villaway; 48 Adra Villaway; 49 Adra Villaway; 50 Adra Villaway; 51 Adra Villaway; 51 Grado Villaway; 52 Adra Villaway; 53 Adra Villaway; 53 Grado Villaway; 54 Adra Villaway; 55 Adra Villaway; 56 Adra Villaway; 57 Adra Villaway; 58 Adra Villaway; 59 Adra Villaway; 60 Adra Villaway; 61 Adra Villaway; 62 Adra Villaway; 63 Adra Villaway; 64 Adra Villaway; 65 Adra Villaway; 66 Adra Villaway; 67 Adra Villaway; 69 Adra Villaway
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 22 December 2011
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Adra Villaway; 1 Okra Tomar Cres; 1 Tomar Villaway; 1-25 Grado Villaway; 2 Tomar Villaway; 2-24 Grado Villaway; 3 Adra Villaway; 3 Tomar Villaway; 4 Tomar Villaway; 5 Adra Villaway; 5 Tomar Villaway; 6 Adra Villaway; 6 Tomar Villaway; 7 Adra Villaway; 7 Tomar Villaway; 8 Adra Villaway; 8 Tomar Villaway; 9 Adra Villaway; 9 Tomar Villaway; 10 Adra Villaway; 10 Tomar Villaway; 11 Adra Villaway; 11 Tomar Villaway; 12 Adra Villaway; 12 Tomar Villaway; 13 Adra Villaway; 13 Tomar Villaway; 14 Adra Villaway; 14 Tomar Villaway; 15 Adra Villaway; 15 Tomar Villaway; 16 Adra Villaway; 16 Tomar Villaway; 17 Adra Villaway; 17 Tomar Villaway; 18 Adra Villaway; 18 Tomar Villaway; 19 Adra Villaway; 19 Tomar Villaway; 20 Adra Villaway; 20 Tomar Villaway; 21 Adra Villaway; 21 Tomar Villaway; 22 Adra Villaway; 22 Tomar Villaway; 23 Adra Villaway; 23 Tomar Villaway; 24 Tomar Villaway; 25 Adra Grado Way; 25 Adra Villaway; 25 Tomar Villaway; 26 Tomar Villaway; 27 Adra Villaway; 27 Tomar Villaway; 28 Tomar Villaway; 29 Adra Villaway; 29 Tomar Villaway; 30 Okra Tomar Cres; 30-44 Grado Villaway; 31 Adra Villaway; 33 Adra Villaway; 35 Adra Villaway; 37-49 Grado Villaway; 45 Adra Villaway; 46 Adra Villaway; 47 Adra Villaway; 48 Adra Villaway; 49 Adra Villaway; 50 Adra Villaway; 51 Adra Villaway; 51 Grado Villaway; 52 Adra Villaway; 53 Adra Villaway; 53 Grado Villaway; 54 Adra Villaway; 55 Adra Villaway; 56 Adra Villaway; 57 Adra Villaway; 58 Adra Villaway; 59 Adra Villaway; 60 Adra Villaway; 61 Adra Villaway; 62 Adra Villaway; 63 Adra Villaway; 64 Adra Villaway; 65 Adra Villaway; 66 Adra Villaway; 67 Adra Villaway; 69 Adra Villaway
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Submitted
- 22 December 2011
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 642 units; 71,319 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Revised application proposes 121 rental dwelling units on the northern portion of the site in five, 4-storey buildings comprising 87 back-to-back stacked townhouse units and 34 apartment units and proposes 642 condominium dwelling units on the southern portion of the site in two buildings with heights ranging from 6 to 12 and 6 to 18 storeys. The revised proposal has an overall gross floor area of 71,319 square metres resulting in a density of 2.71 FSI. The revised proposal also includes a new public road.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.