Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 317575 STE 14 OZ

Ward 4 · Gord PerksDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 29 November 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 2376 Dundas St W; 2382 Dundas St W
Ward: Ward 4 · Gord Perks
Submitted: 29 November 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 369 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Redevelopment of the existing site for a new mixed use development containing a 8-storey mid-rise building on Dundas St W and a 23 storey tower on the eastern portion of the site adjacent the rail corridor. The 8-storey building effectively functions as the base-building (podium) for the tower. The development would include 369 dwelling units, ground floor retail (totaling 466.3 sq m), 234 vehicle parking spaces and 285 bicycle parking spaces. Included in the proposal is a pedestrian walkway for connection to a proposed new Bloor Go/Air link and TTC subway entrance. Also included in the revised proposal is a pedestrian pick-up and Drop-off facility for the GO Transit/Metrolinx Air-Rail Link facility proposed for the site.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Queenswell Ltd.
SM29393 · 12 December 2019 · “2376 Dundas Street West”
Queenswell Ltd.
SM28132 · 2 May 2019 · “2376 Dundas Street West”
Dunwest Properties Ltd.
SM26900 · 26 October 2018 · “2376 Dundas Street West.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4

12 lobbied · 20 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4: 12 lobbied and 20 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	12	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	20	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.