Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 267474 STE 30 OZ

266 Coxwell Ave; 1612 Gerrard St E; 1614 Gerrard St E; 1616 Gerrard St E; 1618 Gerrard St E; 1620 Gerrard St E; 1622 Gerrard St E

Ward 14 · Paula FletcherDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 1 September 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 266 Coxwell Ave; 1612 Gerrard St E; 1614 Gerrard St E; 1616 Gerrard St E; 1618 Gerrard St E; 1620 Gerrard St E; 1622 Gerrard St E
Ward: Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
Submitted: 1 September 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Official Plan Amendment to support required Rental Housing Demolition Control Application filed under related folder 11-267504 in order to facilitate the technical severance of 1612 Gerrard St E, 1614 Gerrard St E, 1616 Gerrard St E and 1618 Gerrard St E into individual ownership. Note - 3 convenience addresses for 1618 Gerrard St E are 1620 Gerrard St E, 1622 Gerrard St E, and 266 Coxwell Ave. Please also note that fee for rental housing demolition is exempted when accompanied by OPA.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14

18 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14: 18 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 14 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	18	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	28	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.