Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 11 219591 STE 28 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 15 June 2011
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 60 Mill St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 15 June 2011
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
OPA and Rezoning application to construct new 6-storey hotel within existing heritage building (Rack House D, at northeast corner of Mill Street and Trinity Street) and construct an additional 28 stories above for new condominium tower; 34 stories in total. A total of 88 hotel rooms and 246 residential condo units are proposed, with retail uses at-grade, and 166 parking spaces leased off-site. On May 15, 2017, the OMB approved a 7-storey addition to the existing Rack House D Building, resulting in a 12-storey building.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Gupta Group of HotelsSM30378 · 24 July 2020 · “60 Mill Street”
- Gupta Group of HotelsSM30374 · 23 July 2020 · “60 Mill Street”
- 1293446 Ontario Inc.SM30293 · 9 July 2020 · “60 Mill Street”
- Gupta Group of HotelsSM30158 · 3 June 2020 · “60 Mill Street”
- Gupta Group of HotelsSM30159 · 3 June 2020 · “60 Mill Street”
- Gupta Group of HotelsSM29454 · 19 December 2019 · “60 Mill Street”
- Easton's GroupSM28203 · 16 May 2019 · “60 Mill Street”
- Cityscape Development CorporationSM21303 · 23 January 2015 · “60 Mill Street”
- Cityscape Development CorporationSM21308 · 23 January 2015 · “60 Mill Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
83 lobbied · 97 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 83 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 11% | 0.14 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 97 | 1,793 | 93% (n=14) | 7% | 17% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.