Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Development application 10 321170 STE 20 PL
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 30 December 2010
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
- Addresses
- 50 R Ryerson Ave
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 30 December 2010
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 10 188413 STE 20 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Part lot control exemption to permit the severance of lands into three parts in order that three detached dwellings approved by minor variance and the Ontario Municipal Board may be constructed and conveyed into separate ownership. Please refer to related common element condominium application fot he provision of common services to serve the new dwellings to be constructed on the lands and the existing dweling located on the lands municipally known as 52 Ryerson Ave. Note: refer to previous approval for conveyance that had lapsed due to conditions of approval not capable of being fulfilled. Part lot control exemption will also allow any easements and or rights of way deemed necessary to support the development.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.