Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 10 259554 STE 19 SA
9 Dewson St; 11 Dewson St; 251 Roxton Rd; 253 Roxton Rd; 255 Roxton Rd; 257 Roxton Rd; 259 Roxton Rd; 261 Roxton Rd; 263 Roxton Rd; 265 Roxton Rd; 267 Roxton Rd; 269 Roxton Rd; 271 Roxton Rd; 273 Roxton Rd; 275 Roxton Rd; 277 Roxton Rd; 279 Roxton Rd; 281 Roxton Rd; 283 Roxton Rd; 285 Roxton Rd; 287 Roxton Rd; 289 Roxton Rd; 291 Roxton Rd; 293 Roxton Rd; 295 Roxton Rd; 297 Roxton Rd; 299 Roxton Rd; 480 Shaw St; 482 Shaw St; 484 Shaw St; 486 Shaw St; 488 Shaw St; 490 Shaw St; 492 Shaw St; 494 Shaw St; 496 Shaw St; 498 Shaw St; 500 Shaw St; 502 Shaw St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 16 September 2010
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 9 Dewson St; 11 Dewson St; 251 Roxton Rd; 253 Roxton Rd; 255 Roxton Rd; 257 Roxton Rd; 259 Roxton Rd; 261 Roxton Rd; 263 Roxton Rd; 265 Roxton Rd; 267 Roxton Rd; 269 Roxton Rd; 271 Roxton Rd; 273 Roxton Rd; 275 Roxton Rd; 277 Roxton Rd; 279 Roxton Rd; 281 Roxton Rd; 283 Roxton Rd; 285 Roxton Rd; 287 Roxton Rd; 289 Roxton Rd; 291 Roxton Rd; 293 Roxton Rd; 295 Roxton Rd; 297 Roxton Rd; 299 Roxton Rd; 480 Shaw St; 482 Shaw St; 484 Shaw St; 486 Shaw St; 488 Shaw St; 490 Shaw St; 492 Shaw St; 494 Shaw St; 496 Shaw St; 498 Shaw St; 500 Shaw St; 502 Shaw St
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 16 September 2010
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Site plan approval application for new townhouse - condo development. 37 Freehold units.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | 1,629 | 100% (n=12) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.