Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 10 234425 NNY 16 SA
33 Orchard View Blvd; 411 Duplex Ave; 2300 Yonge St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 6 August 2010
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 33 Orchard View Blvd; 411 Duplex Ave; 2300 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Submitted
- 6 August 2010
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 09 110945 NNY 16 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To permit the redevelopment of the Yonge-Eglinton Centre (20 Eglinton Avenue West, 2300 Yonge Street, 33 Orchard View Boulevard and 411 Duplex Avenue). The redevelopment proposal consists of the creation of 4,020 square metres of new retail / commercial space in a 3-storey building along the Yonge-Eglinton corner and additions to the existing office towers of 5 storeys (20 Eglinton Avenue) and 7 storeys (2300 Yonge Street). Also included are: improvements and enhancements to the public realm both within and outside the buildings, additional landscaping and open space areas, and a publicly accessible roof garden.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- RioCan Real Estate Investment TrustSM36893 · 19 August 2025 · “2300 Yonge Street”
- RioCan REITSM36188 · 13 December 2024 · “2300 Yonge Street”
- RioCan REITSM35375 · 5 March 2024 · “2300 Yonge Street”
- RC 3180 DUFFERING LPSM32166 · 6 August 2021 · “2300 Yonge Street”
- RIOCAN YEC HOLDINGSSM19640 · 6 September 2013 · “2300 Yonge Street.”
- RIOCAN YEC HOLDINGSSM13185 · 19 June 2009 · “2300 Yonge Street”
- RIOCAN YEC HOLDINGSSM13185 · 19 June 2009 · “33 Orchard View Boulevard”
- RIOCAN YEC HOLDINGSSM13185 · 19 June 2009 · “411 Duplex AVenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8
25 lobbied · 69 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 25 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 8% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 4% | 0.00 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.