lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 10 212544 STE 30 SA

99 Rushbrooke Ave; 101 Rushbrooke Ave; 103 Rushbrooke Ave; 105 Rushbrooke Ave; 107 Rushbrooke Ave; 109 Rushbrooke Ave; 1183 Queen St E; 1183A Queen St E; 1183B Queen St E; 1185A Queen St E; 1185B Queen St E; 1185C Queen St E; 1185D Queen St E; 1185E Queen St E; 1185F Queen St E

Ward 14 · Paula FletcherDataset pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
5 July 2010
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
99 Rushbrooke Ave; 101 Rushbrooke Ave; 103 Rushbrooke Ave; 105 Rushbrooke Ave; 107 Rushbrooke Ave; 109 Rushbrooke Ave; 1183 Queen St E; 1183A Queen St E; 1183B Queen St E; 1185A Queen St E; 1185B Queen St E; 1185C Queen St E; 1185D Queen St E; 1185E Queen St E; 1185F Queen St E
Ward
Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
Submitted
5 July 2010
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal to construct 14 four storey freehold townhouses (2185.9m2). Proposal includes at grade parking facility and roof decks.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14

17 lobbied · 35 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14: 17 lobbied and 35 matched unlobbied applications in 11 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied17Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied35Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.