Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 10 182677 STE 20 OZ
323 King St W; 325 King St W; 327 King St W; 333 King St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 26 May 2010
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 323 King St W; 325 King St W; 327 King St W; 333 King St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 26 May 2010
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
the proposed development was presented as a settlment at the OMB and was successfuly defended at a contested hearing in October of 2013. A revised proposal has been submitted on a WITHOUT PREJUDICE basis. The applicant proposes some amendments to the proposal, including an increase in gross floor area (but no change in heigth or massing) a reduction in the required parking and an increase in bicycle parking. The applicant is also proposing to address outstanding requirments from the settlement, including on-site heritage conservation , rental replacement. As noted in the settlment approved by the OMB, the applicant will also be required to submit a site plan application for the proposal. Included in the submission are: a Functiobnal Servicing Report; Urban Transportation Concerations Report; Letter from Heritage Consultant; and revised draft Zoning By-laws.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Empire Communities Ltd.SM26508 · 18 July 2018 · “333 King Street West”
- King Financial Holdings LimitedSM13910 · 4 January 2010 · “333 King Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.