lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 09 199580 NNY 16 OZ

515 Chaplin Cres; 525 Chaplin Cres

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
23 December 2009
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
515 Chaplin Cres; 525 Chaplin Cres
Ward
Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted
23 December 2009
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
290 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

1) 2009: This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 13 storey addition to the existing 8 storey rental building at 515 Chaplin Crescent by demolishing 18 existing rental units, replacing them with 18 rental replacement units and adding a total of 69 net new rental housing units for a total of 290 units on the site. The site is located on the south west corner of Roselawn Avenue and Chaplin Crescent. The site currently contains two existing 8 storey rental apartment buildings with a total of 221 units. A Rental Housing Demolition application was also submitted with the rezoning application for the 18 existing residential rental units proposed to be replaced within the new addition with compensation and the right to return for the tenants. **NOTE - By-laws were never enacted.2) July 27, 2020 - Revised Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 13 storey addition to the existing 8 storey rental building. Changes include a reduction in the number of units to 278 and a structural connection to the existing building limited to the first floor.**Note proposed revisions to the by-laws3) September 18, 2020 additional documents: (a) Letter outlining changes to the application; (b) Letter to Engineering; and (c) Letter on Tieback Encroachment.4) March 2, 2022: Revised Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 13 storey addition to the existing 8 storey rental building. **Note concurrent Site Plan Control Application 12 112660 NNY 16 SA

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=2
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied33—100% (n=2)0%12%0.00
Matched, unlobbied57—100% (n=3)0%27%0.03
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.