Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 08 150526 STE 20 OZ
40 Mercer St; 42 Mercer St; 44 Mercer St; 46 Mercer St; 115 Blue Jays Way; 119 Blue Jays Way; 337 King St W; 343 King St W; 355 King St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 23 April 2008
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 40 Mercer St; 42 Mercer St; 44 Mercer St; 46 Mercer St; 115 Blue Jays Way; 119 Blue Jays Way; 337 King St W; 343 King St W; 355 King St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 23 April 2008
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 542 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw Amendment for redevelopment of lands with two proposed mixed use towers having heights of 48 and 18 storeys. The existing public lane separating the proposed redevelopment will continue to be maintained. Revised submission (June 2009) includes 542 residential units, 116 hotels units and commercial uses. Two towers of 47 and 35 storeys are proposed. The public lane is proposed to be reconfigured. Additional revision dated June 2010 modifies the location and height of the two residential towers.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Steve GuptaSM18396 · 5 September 2012 · “355 King Street West”
- Easton's Group of HotelsSM17278 · 6 October 2011 · “355 King Street West”
- Easton's Group of HotelsSM17267 · 3 October 2011 · “355 King Street West”
- 355 Development Inc.SM11905 · 26 June 2008 · “355 King Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.