Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
99 Sudbury St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.64106, -79.42260
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 6 | 6 | 2 November 2016 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM22329 | 2090416 Ontario Inc. | 99 Sudbury St. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 13 October 2015 – 13 October 2016 | 1 |
| SM19873 | Tony Petrucci c/o Universal Investment Group | 99 Sudbury Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 21 November 2013 – 10 August 2018 | 5 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 9 November 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 224338 STE 09 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 31 March 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 135661 STE 18 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 224338 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 November 2023 | Under Review In progress |
| 14 135661 STE 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 31 March 2014 | OMB Appeal In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
99 Sudbury St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 135661 STE 18 OZ · submitted 31 March 2014 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM19873 (Tony Petrucci c/o Universal Investment Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19873: Rezoning application re: 99 Sudbury Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 135661 STE 18 OZ at 99 Sudbury St: Proposal for a rezoning application for the redevelopment of the site for a 26-storey mixed-use building containing a hotel, event space, ancillary retail, and residential uses at 99 Sudbury Street. The first 6 storeys of the building will contain the hotel and commercial uses (including 101 hotel … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning application re: 99 Sudbury Street
Matched fields
- address
- 99 SUDBURY ST
- application_address
- 99 SUDBURY ST
99 Sudbury St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 135661 STE 18 OZ · submitted 31 March 2014 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM22329 (2090416 Ontario Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM22329: Rezoning application in support of redevelopment of 99 Sudbury St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 135661 STE 18 OZ at 99 Sudbury St: Proposal for a rezoning application for the redevelopment of the site for a 26-storey mixed-use building containing a hotel, event space, ancillary retail, and residential uses at 99 Sudbury Street. The first 6 storeys of the building will contain the hotel and commercial uses (including 101 hotel … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning application in support of redevelopment of 99 Sudbury St.
Matched fields
- address
- 99 SUDBURY ST
- application_address
- 99 SUDBURY ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.