Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
98 Winona Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.67749, -79.43160
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 17 Davenport | Member of council | 9 | 3 | 16 June 2014 |
| Office Councillor Palacio, Ward 17 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 29 July 2014 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM20275 | The Japanese School of Toronto Shokokai Inc. | 98 Winona Drive | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Minor Va… | 14 April 2014 – 31 December 2014 | 1 |
| SM20271 | The Japanese School of Toronto Shokokai Inc. | 98 Winona Drive | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Minor Va… | 9 April 2014 – 31 December 2014 | 1 |
| SM20203 | The Japanese School of Toronto Shokokai Inc. | 98 Winona Drive | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Minor Va… | 20 March 2014 – 31 December 2014 | 9 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 26 October 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0967/20TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 26 November 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1211/19TEYClosed · Refused
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0967/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 26 October 2020 | Closed Approved |
| A1211/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 26 November 2019 | Closed Refused |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.