Address · Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
975 Weston Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Location
- 43.68447, -79.48345
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 21 October 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 228761 WET 05 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 21 October 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 228762 WET 05 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 228761 WET 05 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 21 October 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 228762 WET 05 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 21 October 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
955 Weston Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 228762 WET 05 OZ · submitted 21 October 2021 · Closed · from registration SM33343 (Haven Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33343: For 955-969 Weston Road: Zoning by-law and Official Plan amendment for proposed site development. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 228762 WET 05 OZ at 955 Weston Rd: The two 34- and 24-storey towers with a 8-storey, mid-rise base building wrapping around the Weston Road frontage, along with a new approximately 1,470 square metre public park located at the Northwest corner of the subject site (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: For 955-969 Weston Road: Zoning by-law and Official Plan amendment for proposed site development.
Matched fields
- address
- 955-969 WESTON RD
- application_address
- 955 WESTON RD
955 Weston Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 228762 WET 05 OZ · submitted 21 October 2021 · Closed · from registration SM35503 (Haven Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35503: Zoning by-law and Official Plan amendment for proposed site development located at 955-969 Weston Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 228762 WET 05 OZ at 955 Weston Rd: The two 34- and 24-storey towers with a 8-storey, mid-rise base building wrapping around the Weston Road frontage, along with a new approximately 1,470 square metre public park located at the Northwest corner of the subject site (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning by-law and Official Plan amendment for proposed site development located at 955-969 Weston Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 955-969 WESTON RD
- application_address
- 955 WESTON RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 5
15 lobbied · 40 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 40 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5
12 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.