Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
92 Isabella St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.66882, -79.38083
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 10 April 2026Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 26 141806 STE 13 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 30 May 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 153992 STE 13 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 8 February 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0155/21TEYClosed · Approved
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 141806 STE 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 10 April 2026 | Council Approved Approved |
| 22 153992 STE 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 May 2022 | Council Approved Approved |
| A0155/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 8 February 2021 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
92 Isabella St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 153992 STE 13 OZ · submitted 30 May 2022 · Council Approved · from registration SM32807 (Capital Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32807: 90, 90A, 92, 94, 94A Isabella Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 153992 STE 13 OZ at 92 Isabella St: Rezoning for proposed for a 69-storey mixed-use building having a gross floor area of 52,989 square metres and 837 dwelling units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 90, 90A, 92, 94, 94A Isabella Street
Matched fields
- address
- 94A ISABELLA ST
- application_address
- 94 ISABELLA ST
92 Isabella St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 153992 STE 13 OZ · submitted 30 May 2022 · Council Approved · from registration SM32808 (Capital Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32808: 90, 90A, 92, 94, 94A Isabella Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 153992 STE 13 OZ at 92 Isabella St: Rezoning for proposed for a 69-storey mixed-use building having a gross floor area of 52,989 square metres and 837 dwelling units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 90, 90A, 92, 94, 94A Isabella Street
Matched fields
- address
- 94A ISABELLA ST
- application_address
- 94 ISABELLA ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 13
5 lobbied · 76 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 76 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.