lobbyTO

Address · Ward 16 · Jon Burnside

895 Lawrence Ave E

Registrations naming this address
3
1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations
16
5 offices contacted
Applications at this address
1
No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
1
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
Location
43.73576, -79.34751
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

3

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Data table· 5 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Jon BurnsideCouncillor staff9110 July 2023
Jon BurnsideMember of council3129 May 2023
Mike ColleCouncillor staff2029 March 2023
Denzil Minnan-WongCouncillor staff116 February 2020
Ward 16 Don Valley EastMember of council1019 July 2022
All registrations· 3 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM34113First capital Realty895 Lawrence Avenue E.Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of …1 February 2023 – 1 February 20258
SM34117First capital Realty895 Lawrence Avenue E.Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of …1 February 2023 – 1 February 20254
SM29708First capital Realty895 Lawrence Avenue East.Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law4 February 2020 – 30 January 20264

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

1
Data table· 1 row
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
22 180913 NNY 16 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)22 July 2022OMB Appeal
In progress

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16

4 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16: 4 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied4Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied8Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.