Address · Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
895 Lawrence Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Location
- 43.73576, -79.34751
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jon Burnside | Councillor staff | 9 | 1 | 10 July 2023 |
| Jon Burnside | Member of council | 3 | 1 | 29 May 2023 |
| Mike Colle | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 29 March 2023 |
| Denzil Minnan-Wong | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 6 February 2020 |
| Ward 16 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 19 July 2022 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34113 | First capital Realty | 895 Lawrence Avenue E. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of … | 1 February 2023 – 1 February 2025 | 8 |
| SM34117 | First capital Realty | 895 Lawrence Avenue E. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of … | 1 February 2023 – 1 February 2025 | 4 |
| SM29708 | First capital Realty | 895 Lawrence Avenue East. | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 4 February 2020 – 30 January 2026 | 4 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 22 July 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 180913 NNY 16 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 180913 NNY 16 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 July 2022 | OMB Appeal In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
- 895 Lawrence Avenue East - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions2026.CC39.10 · 26 March 2026
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16
4 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.