Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
89 Dunfield Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.70695, -79.39501
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 2 April 2014Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 14 136799 STE 22 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 31 October 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 217828 STE 22 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 136799 STE 22 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 2 April 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 217828 STE 22 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 31 October 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
79 Dunfield Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 217828 STE 22 OZ · submitted 31 October 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11878 (Madison Properties)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11878: Review and discussion of proposed development applications for property at 85 - 117 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 217828 STE 22 OZ at 79 Dunfield Ave: Rezoning application for new mixed use building for the lands municipally known as 79 Dunfield Ave and 85-117 Eglinton Ave E inclusive (The Madison). Propsal is to erect one 29 storey tower and one 26 storey tower above a 7, stepping to 8 storey podium building containing 579 residential dwelling u… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Review and discussion of proposed development applications for property at 85 - 117 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 85-117 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 85 EGLINTON AVE E
79 Dunfield Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 217828 STE 22 OZ · submitted 31 October 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11890 (Madison Homes)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM11890: Review and discuss development applications for property located at 85-117 Eglinton Ave East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 217828 STE 22 OZ at 79 Dunfield Ave: Rezoning application for new mixed use building for the lands municipally known as 79 Dunfield Ave and 85-117 Eglinton Ave E inclusive (The Madison). Propsal is to erect one 29 storey tower and one 26 storey tower above a 7, stepping to 8 storey podium building containing 579 residential dwelling u… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Review and discuss development applications for property located at 85-117 Eglinton Ave East
Matched fields
- address
- 85-117 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 85 EGLINTON AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12
5 lobbied · 11 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.