Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
89 Avenue Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.67235, -79.39532
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 27 August 2012 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM17553 | FreedCorp | 89 Avenue Road | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan | 13 December 2011 – 8 July 2014 | 2 |
| SM17543 | FREED Developments | 89 Avenue Road | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-… | 12 December 2011 – 12 November 2014 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 30 April 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 146963 STE 11 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 March 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 146411 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 March 2012Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 12 146417 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 146963 STE 11 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 April 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 146411 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 March 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 146417 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 March 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
89 Avenue Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 146411 STE 27 OZ · submitted 30 March 2012 · Closed · from registration SM17543 (FREED Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.97
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM17543: Prep of Planning & Urban Design Rationale Report in Support of ZBA Application for 89 Avenue Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 146411 STE 27 OZ at 89 Avenue Rd: Rezoning application to construct new 28 storey, mixed use (hotel and residential) building with a 6-storey portion at rear (adjacent to private lane) and a 3-storey component connecting the two. Proposed are 41 residential units and 80 hotel units with flexibility to replace the hotel component wi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Prep of Planning & Urban Design Rationale Report in Support of ZBA Application for 89 Avenue Road
Matched fields
- address
- 89 AVENUE RD
- application_address
- 89 AVENUE RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.