Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
85 Richmond St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.65057, -79.38295
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor McConnell | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 22 September 2017 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM25069 | Oxford Properties Group | 85 Richmond Street West | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 22 September 2017 – 31 January 2018 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 29 August 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 224564 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 15 May 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0553/17TEYClosed · Approved
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 224564 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 29 August 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0553/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 15 May 2017 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
85 Richmond St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 224564 STE 28 SA · submitted 29 August 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25069 (Oxford Properties Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25069: Minor Variance and Site Plan application related to 85 Richmond Street West for Oxford Properties Group (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 224564 STE 28 SA at 85 Richmond St W: Site Plan Approval application for the renovation and enhancement of the existing building. Scope of work includes heritage restoration, re-cladding and the addition of floor area to certain portions of the building while maintaining the existing overall footprint. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance and Site Plan application related to 85 Richmond Street West for Oxford Properties Group
Matched fields
- address
- 85 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 85 RICHMOND ST W
85 Richmond St W · Minor variance (MV)
A0553/17TEY · submitted 15 May 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25069 (Oxford Properties Group)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25069: Minor Variance and Site Plan application related to 85 Richmond Street West for Oxford Properties Group (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0553/17TEY at 85 Richmond St W: To alter the existing office building by facilitating heritage restoration, recladding and the addition of non-residential gross floor area to the rear of the building. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance and Site Plan application related to 85 Richmond Street West for Oxford Properties Group
Matched fields
- address
- 85 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 85 RICHMOND ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.