Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow

836 St Clair Ave W

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 4; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 3; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Location: 43.68074, -79.43154
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Rockport Homes LimitedSM23022 · 21 April 20163
UrbancorpSM19699 · 26 September 20131

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 21 St. Paul's4

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 21 St. Paul's	Member of council	4	4	21 April 2016

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM23022	Rockport Homes Limited	836 St. Clair Ave West	Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian…	21 April 2016 – 31 December 2016	3
SM19699	Urbancorp	836 St. Clair Ave. W.	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan	26 September 2013 – 14 May 2017	1

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 10 February 2022Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 22 112796 STE 12 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 31 January 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0154/22TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 10 September 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 233007 STE 21 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 3 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
22 112796 STE 12 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	10 February 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0154/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	31 January 2022	Closed Approved
13 233007 STE 21 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	10 September 2013	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

836 St Clair Ave W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 233007 STE 21 SA · submitted 10 September 2013 · Closed · from registration SM19699 (Urbancorp)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19699: 836 St. Clair Ave. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 233007 STE 21 SA at 836 St Clair Ave W: Proposal to construct a 9 storey mixed use building with 116 units, 2 levels of underground parking and retail at grade. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 836 St. Clair Ave. W.
Matched fields
address
836 ST CLAIR AVE W
application_address
836 ST CLAIR AVE W

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12

5 lobbied · 11 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12: 5 lobbied and 11 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	11	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12

20 lobbied · 357 matched

Median days

Lobbied106
Matched, unlobbied145

Approval rate

Lobbied50% n=12
Matched, unlobbied90% n=291

Refusal rate

Lobbied50%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied35%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied86%
Matched, unlobbied30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12: 20 lobbied and 357 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	106	50% (n=12)	50%	35%	86%
Matched, unlobbied	357	145	90% (n=291)	10%	5%	30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	32	—	100% (n=4)	0%	3%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	72	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.05

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide