Address · Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
835 Eglinton Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Location
- 43.71287, -79.36278
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 8 March 2022Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 22 120573 NNY 15 PLUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 12 August 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 197734 NNY 15 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 30 July 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 201853 NNY 26 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 July 2018Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 18 201865 NNY 26 SBOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 19 August 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 210199 NNY 26 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 120573 NNY 15 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 8 March 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 197734 NNY 15 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 12 August 2021 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 18 201853 NNY 26 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 July 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 201865 NNY 26 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 30 July 2018 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| 16 210199 NNY 26 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 August 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
815 Eglinton Ave E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 197734 NNY 15 SA · submitted 12 August 2021 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM27592 (RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27592: Assisting with the development of 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 197734 NNY 15 SA at 815 Eglinton Ave E: Site Plan application for the redevelopment of the existing 8.8 acre site with a total density of 3.87. The proposal includes 5,230m² of retail, 5-storey office (12,274 m²), 109,608 of residential (1,616 units), a new public park (0.32 ha), daycare space (1,224 m²) and a network of public and priva… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 815-845 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 815 EGLINTON AVE E
845 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 201853 NNY 26 OZ · submitted 30 July 2018 · Closed · from registration SM24061 (RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24061: Development application for 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 201853 NNY 26 OZ at 845 Eglinton Ave E: The proposal is for the redevelopment of the existing 8.8 acre site with a total density of 3.87. The proposal includes 5,708.7 m2 of retail, 5-storey office (9,655 m2), 116,252 of residential (1,672 units), a new public park (0.32 ha), community and daycare spaces (2,100 m2) and a network of publi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East.
Matched fields
- address
- 815-845 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 815 EGLINTON AVE E
845 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 201853 NNY 26 OZ · submitted 30 July 2018 · Closed · from registration SM27592 (RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27592: Assisting with the development of 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 201853 NNY 26 OZ at 845 Eglinton Ave E: The proposal is for the redevelopment of the existing 8.8 acre site with a total density of 3.87. The proposal includes 5,708.7 m2 of retail, 5-storey office (9,655 m2), 116,252 of residential (1,672 units), a new public park (0.32 ha), community and daycare spaces (2,100 m2) and a network of publi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 815-845 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 815 EGLINTON AVE E
815 Eglinton Ave E · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
18 201865 NNY 26 SB · submitted 30 July 2018 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM24061 (RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24061: Development application for 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 201865 NNY 26 SB at 815 Eglinton Ave E: The proposal is for the redevelopment of the existing 8.8 acre site with a total density of 3.87. The proposal includes 5,708.7 m2 of retail, 116,252 m2 of residential (1,672 units), 5-storey office (12,796.3 m2) a new public park (0.34 ha), publicly-accessible open space (POPS 2,800 m2), community… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East.
Matched fields
- address
- 815-845 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 815 EGLINTON AVE E
815 Eglinton Ave E · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
18 201865 NNY 26 SB · submitted 30 July 2018 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM27592 (RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27592: Assisting with the development of 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 201865 NNY 26 SB at 815 Eglinton Ave E: The proposal is for the redevelopment of the existing 8.8 acre site with a total density of 3.87. The proposal includes 5,708.7 m2 of retail, 116,252 m2 of residential (1,672 units), 5-storey office (12,796.3 m2) a new public park (0.34 ha), publicly-accessible open space (POPS 2,800 m2), community… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 815-845 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 815 EGLINTON AVE E
815 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 210199 NNY 26 OZ · submitted 19 August 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24061 (RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24061: Development application for 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 210199 NNY 26 OZ at 815 Eglinton Ave E: The proposal is for the redevelopment of the existing 8.8 acre site with a total density of 3.87. The proposal includes 5,708.7 m2 of retail, 116,252 m2 of residential (1,672 units), a new public park (0.34 ha), a 5-storey office (12,796.3m2), publicly-accessible open space (POPS 2,800 m2), communi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East.
Matched fields
- address
- 815-845 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 815 EGLINTON AVE E
815 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 210199 NNY 26 OZ · submitted 19 August 2016 · Closed · from registration SM27592 (RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27592: Assisting with the development of 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 210199 NNY 26 OZ at 815 Eglinton Ave E: The proposal is for the redevelopment of the existing 8.8 acre site with a total density of 3.87. The proposal includes 5,708.7 m2 of retail, 116,252 m2 of residential (1,672 units), a new public park (0.34 ha), a 5-storey office (12,796.3m2), publicly-accessible open space (POPS 2,800 m2), communi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 815-845 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 815 EGLINTON AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15
12 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 15% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 30% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.