Address · Ward 6 · James Pasternak
795 Sheppard Ave W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Location
- 43.75307, -79.44896
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 30 June 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 170200 NNY 06 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 31 August 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 206529 NNY 06 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 17 August 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 208768 NNY 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 170200 NNY 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 June 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 206529 NNY 06 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 31 August 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 208768 NNY 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 August 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
797 Sheppard Ave W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 170200 NNY 06 OZ · submitted 30 June 2022 · Closed · from registration SM32012 (Pinemount Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32012: Specific to a planning application located in North York for a mid-rise apartment development. The address of the site is128 - 132 Gorman Park Road and 795-799 Sheppard Ave. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 170200 NNY 06 OZ at 797 Sheppard Ave W: Zoning By-law Amendment Application to lift the "H"" Holding Symbol that currently applies to the subject site. (See 16-208768 NNY 10 OZ) (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …on located in North York for a mid-rise apartment development. The address of the site is128 - 132 Gorman Park Road and 795-799 Sheppard Ave. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 795-799 SHEPPARD AVE W
- application_address
- 795 SHEPPARD AVE W
799 Sheppard Ave W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 206529 NNY 06 SA · submitted 31 August 2021 · Closed · from registration SM32012 (Pinemount Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32012: Specific to a planning application located in North York for a mid-rise apartment development. The address of the site is128 - 132 Gorman Park Road and 795-799 Sheppard Ave. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 206529 NNY 06 SA at 799 Sheppard Ave W: Site Plan application for a 9 storey residential building, containing 85 residential dwelling units, rooftop mechanical penthouse, 7 surface parking spaces, and 170 square meters of indoor amenity space on the ground floor. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …on located in North York for a mid-rise apartment development. The address of the site is128 - 132 Gorman Park Road and 795-799 Sheppard Ave. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 795-799 SHEPPARD AVE W
- application_address
- 795 SHEPPARD AVE W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.