Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
780 Yonge St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.66982, -79.38697
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayors Office | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 10 March 2015 |
| Ward 34 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 10 March 2015 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM21963 | Mizrahi Inc. | 780 Yonge Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 10 March 2015 – 31 December 2015 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 18 December 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 230612 STE 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 March 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 128257 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 March 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 128261 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 230612 STE 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 December 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 128257 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 March 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 128261 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 March 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 230612 STE 11 OZ · submitted 18 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM32374 (Mizrahi Development Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32374: 1-11 Bloor Street West and 768-784 Yonge Street - Zoning By-law Amendment request for increased height. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 230612 STE 11 OZ at 1 Bloor St W: Zoning By-law Amendment Application to permit a 94-storey mixed use building, containing 505 dwelling units and 17,669 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. OLT Appeal: withdrawn by applicant - OLT order in attachments (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1-11 Bloor Street West and 768-784 Yonge Street - Zoning By-law Amendment request for increased height.
Matched fields
- address
- 1-11 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1 BLOOR ST W
768 Yonge St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 128257 STE 27 SA · submitted 16 March 2015 · Closed · from registration SM21973 (Sam Mizrahi)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21973: 1-19 Bloor Street West, 770-784 Yonge Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 128257 STE 27 SA at 768 Yonge St: Proposal for site plan approval for an 80 storey mixed-use building, the first 8 storey above grade will be used for retail, as well as the first storey below grade, eight levels of underground parking will be provided and a total of 544 residential units (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1-19 Bloor Street West, 770-784 Yonge Street
Matched fields
- address
- 1-19 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1 BLOOR ST W
768 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 128261 STE 27 OZ · submitted 16 March 2015 · Closed · from registration SM21963 (Mizrahi Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21963: Zoning, Development, Heritage, Site Plan, Demolition, for 1 Bloor St West, 780 Yonge Street, 778 Yonge Street, 774 Yonge Street, 768 Yong Street, 11 Bloor St West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 128261 STE 27 OZ at 768 Yonge St: Proposal for an 82 storey (306 metres) mixed-use building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning, Development, Heritage, Site Plan, Demolition, for 1 Bloor St West, 780 Yonge Street, 778 Yonge Street, 774 Yonge Street, 768 Yong Street, 11 Bloor St West
Matched fields
- address
- 1 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1 BLOOR ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.