Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
75 Canterbury Pl
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.77407, -79.41501
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
7These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 23 Willowdale | Member of council | 35 | 8 | 20 November 2016 |
| Office of Councillor John Filion, Ward 23 | Councillor staff | 4 | 0 | 17 April 2018 |
| John Filion | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 27 August 2021 |
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 2 | 1 | 24 June 2021 |
| Office of Councillor Fillion, Ward 23 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 25 August 2016 |
All registrations· 7 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM32060 | Churchill Three Develco Inc. | 75 Canterbury Place | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 22 July 2021 – 13 September 2021 | 3 |
| SM31884 | Churchill Three Develco Inc. | 75 Canterbury Place | Planning and Development; Combined Application | 22 June 2021 – 22 June 2022 | 1 |
| SM31830 | Churchill Three Develco Inc. | 75 Canterbury Place | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop… | 11 June 2021 – 15 December 2025 | 1 |
| SM31262 | Churchill Three Develco Inc. | 75 Canterbury Place | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 10 February 2021 – 31 December 2021 | 0 |
| SM25643 | Churchill Three Develco Inc. | 75 Canterbury Place. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 12 February 2018 – 14 February 2027 | 0 |
| SM22525 | Churchill Three Develco Inc. | 75 Canterbury Place | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 25 November 2015 – 19 December 2018 | 6 |
| SM20479 | McCarthy Tetrault LLP | 75 Canterbury Place. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 1 June 2014 – 31 December 2018 | 35 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 7 March 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 124033 NNY 18 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 February 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0215/21NYTLAB Appeal · Approved
- Submitted 10 November 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 217077 NNY 18 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 September 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 230270 NNY 23 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 124033 NNY 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 7 March 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0215/21NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 February 2021 | TLAB Appeal Approved |
| 20 217077 NNY 18 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 10 November 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 230270 NNY 23 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 September 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
75 Canterbury Pl · Minor variance (MV)
A0215/21NY · submitted 23 February 2021 · TLAB Appeal · from registration SM31262 (Churchill Three Develco Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31262: Minor variance application for below grade locker spaces at 75 Canterbury Place, North York, ON. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0215/21NY at 75 Canterbury Pl: To permit the conversion of unused space within the underground garage levels to provide additional storage space for residents, as well as revised dimensions for required bicycle parking spaces. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor variance application for below grade locker spaces at 75 Canterbury Place, North York, ON.
Matched fields
- address
- 75 CANTERBURY PL
- application_address
- 75 CANTERBURY PL
75 Canterbury Pl · Minor variance (MV)
A0215/21NY · submitted 23 February 2021 · TLAB Appeal · from registration SM31830 (Churchill Three Develco Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31830: Minor variance - 75 Canterbury Place, North York ON M2N 2N1 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0215/21NY at 75 Canterbury Pl: To permit the conversion of unused space within the underground garage levels to provide additional storage space for residents, as well as revised dimensions for required bicycle parking spaces. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor variance - 75 Canterbury Place, North York ON M2N 2N1
Matched fields
- address
- 75 CANTERBURY PL
- application_address
- 75 CANTERBURY PL
75 Canterbury Pl · Minor variance (MV)
A0215/21NY · submitted 23 February 2021 · TLAB Appeal · from registration SM32060 (Churchill Three Develco Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32060: To speak with elected officials and staff concerning a development application for a minor variance that is being reviewed by the City. The development application is for 75 Canterbury Place, North York, ON M2N 2N1. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0215/21NY at 75 Canterbury Pl: To permit the conversion of unused space within the underground garage levels to provide additional storage space for residents, as well as revised dimensions for required bicycle parking spaces. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …g a development application for a minor variance that is being reviewed by the City. The development application is for 75 Canterbury Place, North York, ON M2N 2N1.
Matched fields
- address
- 75 CANTERBURY PL
- application_address
- 75 CANTERBURY PL
75 Canterbury Pl · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 230270 NNY 23 OZ · submitted 30 September 2014 · Closed · from registration SM22525 (Churchill Three Develco Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22525: Planning approvals for proposed residential development at 75 Canterbury Place, North York, including pending applications for official plan and zoning by-law amendment and site plan approval. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 230270 NNY 23 OZ at 75 Canterbury Pl: To permit 30-storey (92 metres) residential condominium consisting of 385 units, having a gross floor area of 24,248 square metres and FSI of 4.99. The proposed development will also provide 390 motor vehicle parking spaces on site within a 6-storey underground parking garage. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning approvals for proposed residential development at 75 Canterbury Place, North York, including pending applications for official plan and zoning by-law amendment and site plan approval.
Matched fields
- address
- 75 CANTERBURY PL
- application_address
- 75 CANTERBURY PL
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 18
9 lobbied · 202 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 202 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 18
1 lobbied · 5 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
38 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 38 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 21% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.