Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle
715 Lawrence Ave W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Location
- 43.71505, -79.44805
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 6 December 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 257986 NNY 08 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 18 October 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 238893 NNY 15 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 17 June 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 175970 NNY 15 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 17 June 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 175990 NNY 15 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 257986 NNY 08 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 6 December 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 238893 NNY 15 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 October 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 175970 NNY 15 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 June 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 175990 NNY 15 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 17 June 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
713 Lawrence Ave W · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
19 257986 NNY 08 CD · submitted 6 December 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28870 (Wycliffe Marlee Lawrence Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28870: 713-723 Lawrence Avenue West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 257986 NNY 08 CD at 713 Lawrence Ave W: Draft Plan of Standard Condominium Application for 5 blocks of 4-storey back-to-back residential townhouses containing 84 dwelling units and 1 level of underground parking (Related Site Plan Application is 15-175990NNY 15 SA). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 713-723 Lawrence Avenue West
Matched fields
- address
- 713-723 LAWRENCE AVE W
- application_address
- 713 LAWRENCE AVE W
713 Lawrence Ave W · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
19 257986 NNY 08 CD · submitted 6 December 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28960 (Wycliffe Marlee Lawrence Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28960: 713-723 Lawrence Avenue West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 257986 NNY 08 CD at 713 Lawrence Ave W: Draft Plan of Standard Condominium Application for 5 blocks of 4-storey back-to-back residential townhouses containing 84 dwelling units and 1 level of underground parking (Related Site Plan Application is 15-175990NNY 15 SA). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 713-723 Lawrence Avenue West
Matched fields
- address
- 713-723 LAWRENCE AVE W
- application_address
- 713 LAWRENCE AVE W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 8
1 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8
33 lobbied · 57 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 33 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 12% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 57 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 26% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8
25 lobbied · 69 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 25 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 8% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 4% | 0.00 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.