Address · Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
70 Wicksteed Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Location
- 43.71137, -79.36042
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 24 February 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 120011 NNY 15 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 February 2021Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 21 120012 NNY 15 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 15 February 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 120874 NNY 26 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 November 2012Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 12 280184 NNY 26 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 29 August 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 264854 NNY 26 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 120011 NNY 15 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 24 February 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 120012 NNY 15 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 24 February 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 120874 NNY 26 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 February 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 280184 NNY 26 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 16 November 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 264854 NNY 26 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 29 August 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
70 Wicksteed Ave · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
12 280184 NNY 26 SB · submitted 16 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM20324 (190 Laird Property Co. Ltd.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM20324: Our client is appealing an application for subdivison approval at 70 & 80 Wicksteed Avenue and 202, 204 and 206 Parkhurst Blvd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 280184 NNY 26 SB at 70 Wicksteed Ave: Draft Plan of Subdivision application to extend Vaughan Street and Parkhurst Boulevard to connect with Wicksteed Avenue. The public road extensions are proposed in conjunction with a rezoning application to permit a commercial centre comprising a series of new and existing buildings ranging in size… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Our client is appealing an application for subdivison approval at 70 & 80 Wicksteed Avenue and 202, 204 and 206 Parkhurst Blvd.
Matched fields
- address
- 70&80 WICKSTEED AVE
- application_address
- 70 WICKSTEED AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 10% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 25% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15
12 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.