Address · Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
7 Centre St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
- Location
- 43.74347, -79.22049
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 3 September 2026Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 26 231892 ESC 24 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 10 May 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 143925 ESC 24 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 231892 ESC 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 3 September 2026 | Under Review In progress |
| 23 143925 ESC 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 10 May 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1 Centre St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
26 231892 ESC 24 SA · submitted 3 September 2026 · Under Review · from registration SM35183 (NJS Capital Management Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35183: discuss development application for our project at 3174-3182 Eglinton Ave E/1 & 7 Centre (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 26 231892 ESC 24 SA at 1 Centre St: Proposed a twenty-three (23) storey mixed-use building with a seven (7) storey podium, comprised of a total of three-hundred-and-thirty-five (335) dwelling units and a total Gross Floor Area (¿GFA¿) of 21,167 square metres, including 386 square metres of retail/commercial floor space on the ground … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: discuss development application for our project at 3174-3182 Eglinton Ave E/1 & 7 Centre
Matched fields
- address
- 3174-3182 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 3174 EGLINTON AVE E
1 Centre St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
23 143925 ESC 24 OZ · submitted 10 May 2023 · Closed · from registration SM35183 (NJS Capital Management Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM35183: discuss development application for our project at 3174-3182 Eglinton Ave E/1 & 7 Centre (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 143925 ESC 24 OZ at 1 Centre St: Official Plan & Zoning by-law Amendment for a 23-storey mixed-use building (excluding the mechanical penthouse) with a total gross floor area (GFA) of 21,167 square metres (Including 386.8 m2 of non-residential gross floor area). There will be 335 residential dwelling units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: discuss development application for our project at 3174-3182 Eglinton Ave E/1 & 7 Centre
Matched fields
- address
- 3174-3182 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 3174 EGLINTON AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 24
6 lobbied · 15 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24
8 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.